You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library. Sign Up Log In. Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote. All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience.
They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser. Open Advanced Search. DeepDyve requires Javascript to function. Please enable Javascript on your browser to continue. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich; Ernst, Holger In light of increasing licensing, we challenge the common assumption that product development and technology licensing are substitutes. Read Article. Download PDF. Share Full Text for Free.
Web of Science. Let us know here. System error. Please try again! How was the reading experience on this article? The text was blurry Page doesn't load Other:. Details Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you.
Thank you for submitting a report! Submitting a report will send us an email through our customer support system. Learn more. Follow Us. Ammon reminded authors to include any such disclosure in their submission letters. Labels: OI special issue , open innovation , Research Policy. July 19, L'affaire Lichtenthaler, Part Deux. Among open innovation researchers, the past 24 hours seem to have been spent discussing Ulrich Lichtenthaler and his three retracted articles, including two in Research Policy.
When I review an OI paper, usually I find 1 or 2 cites to his work, and sometimes as many as four. Today, Olaf Storbeck of Handlesblatt the German equivalent to the FT or WSJ reports on the story in a blog article that supplements his German-language news article: Top-flight German business prof faces severe accusations of academic misconduct One of the most successful German business professors is currently facing awkward questions about his scientific conduct.
Ulrich Lichtenthaler, who is affiliated with the University of Mannheim, has come under suspicion of inflating his publication record using unethical methods. Additionally, a number of his published papers apparently contain severe mathematical errors and methodological inconsistencies. The original German article seems to have attracted considerable discussion online. Labels: open innovation , Research Policy , retractions.
July 17, Three less papers on patent licensing. Research Policy today announced the retraction of two papers on patent licensing, a month after a third paper was retracted by Strategic Organization. He is now at the University of Mannheim. Retraction Watch reports that his previous employer has been investigating the matter: We are aware of the retractions. When the underlying problems of the publications of Ulrich Lichtenthaler were brought to our attention WHU decided to establish an investigation committee with external experts to look into these matters.
As WHU condemns all forms of academic misconduct, we are very interested in complete transparency on the issues and, depending on the findings of the committee, we will then take appropriate actions. However, the growing incidence of plagiarism Martin et al. The resulting papers are often sent to different journals. In some cases, the author may cite the other parallel papers.
However, it is very difficult to persuade referees to read not only the paper in question but also the other parallel papers which may not have been published yet and therefore are difficult to access in order to establish whether the former represents a sufficiently substantial and original contribution to merit publication in its own right. Sometimes, this may be picked up by a diligent referee. A quick search of the Research Policy database lists only the one Gottinger and two Lichtenthaler articles as retracted thus far.
Labels: Research Policy , retractions. The active integration of external stakeholders into an organisation's innovation processes independently of their institutional affiliation can take different forms — from the generation of ideas and the development of concepts to participation in the realisation of an innovation. Proposals must be submitted in Word format. Labels: CFP , crowdsourcing , open innovation. June 27, End of the great OI summit.
While the conference was organized to help develop papers for our special issue, in retrospect it also served another purpose — perhaps the largest gathering of leading open innovation scholars in one place at one time since the publication of Open Innovation in Obviously this was no coincidence, as we invited a range of recognized scholars to submit their work for the conference.
As Frank Piller pointed out to me later, the attraction of the special issue also attracted better quality work than one would normally find at a conference. The attendance validated our assumptions about where the center of open innovation research is: 56 of the 60 attendees or 30 of the 34 plenary paper authors came from Europe.
In the original discussions, we considered holding it in Berkeley, but — as predicted — London proved to be the ideal central location, reachable by local train, Eurostar, intra-European and for four of us transatlantic flights. We were disappointed not to have any research from Asia, but hopefully that will be remedied in the special issue submissions. The nature of the attendees demonstrates the vibrancy of field stream?
The discussion was vigorous and spirited, with authors getting welter of ideas of how to improve their work. We deliberately allocated half of the presentation for discussion, by some combination of the discussant and the audience.
Several times I had to bite my tongue — when presenters were arguing with those trying to help improve the paper, rather than quickly thanking them for the suggestions and using the time to solicit for further feedback. We also had good participation at the posters — not as many people hearing each poster, but for some authors, as many people providing feedback as in the plenary session. Labels: conferences , ICL Conference , open innovation. June 26, Running a special issue.
The real reason was to get some of the best open innovation scholars in the world under one roof to teach and learn from each other. In a brief talk Tuesday just before lunch, Martin spoke about something nearer to the hearts of the assembled audience of OI researchers — how a Research Policy special issue works.
He talked about the guidelines and heuristics RP as developed to get special issues that provide both quality and integration. This what RP looks for in a special issue — and, I submit, what the guest editors have done thus far. Finally, he encouraged the audience a submit their own proposal in the future for one of the annual special issues of Research Policy.
June 25, Open Innovation workshop: Day One. The four editors of the special issues were on hand to hear Ben Martin lead editor of Research Policy talk about 20 challenges for innovation studies going forward. We have a very impressive lineup of 22 papers and 8 posters which promise to move the study of open innovation forward.
With 60 attendees registered — all interested in open innovation — the two days promise to have a vigorous discussion of the papers and the field going forward. We are quite pleased with the participation of authors and attendees. The vigorous discussion should help both the individual papers and the overall portfolio of work that we receive in August for the Research Policy special issue.
May 11, Open innovation is not open distributed innovation. Eric von Hippel has said so, and I think I know Henry Chesbrough well enough to say he would say so as well. I personally am proud of having a foot in both camps, having tried for the past five years to both link and draw nuances between these literatures.
The rest, as they say, is history. Phillips, W. Porter, Michael E. New York: Free Press. Raffai, Csilla PhD thesis, University of Pannonia. Sborn, A. Foster innovation and creative talent for the public. Translated by Hasan GhasemZadeh. Tehran: Niloofar Pub. Soltani, T. Institutional Innovation in Organizations. Tehran: Cultural services Pub. Shane, Scott Teece, David J. London: Oxford University Press. Research Policy, 35 8 , Teece, D. Strategic Management Journal, 18 7 , Zawislak, P.
Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7 2 , 14 -
0コメント